Reaction to the coming FBI housecleaning
President-elect Donald Trump's nominations so far have generated significant backlash from establishmentarians, confirming the picks' strategic value as disruptors.
While Trump has yet to disclose who, if anyone, he wants to replace FBI Director Christopher Wray — whose term does not expire until 2027 — the old guard's pre-emptive attacks on former National Security Council official Kash Patel signal that he might be the prospect most threatening to the dysfunctional status quo.
Senior officials at the highly politicized bureau are preparing for a thorough housecleaning. Meanwhile, former FBI Special Agent Daniel Brunner has gone to the liberal media with his concerns, blasting Patel as "dangerous" and insinuating that his housecleaning may prove to be more thorough than that executed by others.
When speaking to CNN's Jessica Dean on Sunday, Brunner parroted the talking points that have been recycled by others in Washington, D.C., in response to each of Trump's appointment announcements: Patel is supposedly inexperienced, revenge-driven, and keen on littering a sacrosanct federal agency with pink slips.
...
Another prospect, former Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), has not been subject to the kind of attacks that Patel has faced in recent days.
Semafor reported that the "MAGA wing" of the Republican Party is keen to see Patel as FBI director, whereas "more conventional Republicans" are pushing for Rogers, the former chair of the House Intelligence Committee who defended warrantless surveillance of American citizens.
...
There is no shortage of people who believe that the FBI needs a house cleaning. The Russian collusion hoax perpetrated against Trump was a total of two years or more fraud to try to overthrow an election. Those responsible for it should face consequences for the unwarranted attacks on Trump and his supporters.
See also:
This whistleblower confessed a terrifying reality about the FBI
And:
...
An FBI headquarters official has issued a damning warning that the bureau’s Security Clearance Division (SecD) is deeply politicized, raising concerns about its impartiality in screening President-elect Donald Trump’s nominees for high-level administration posts.
The explosive allegations, outlined in a whistleblower disclosure reviewed by The Washington Times, suggest a troubling misuse of power within the FBI.
...
Comments
Post a Comment