Dems fear effectiveness of Pam Bondi as AG

 American Action News:

Political scientist Jason Johnson on Thursday called Pam Bondi — who is President-elect Donald Trump’s new choice for U.S. Attorney General — a savvy legal operator who can advance Trump’s agenda.

During an appearance on MSNBC’s “The Beat With Ari Melber,” Johnson also said that Bondi’s expertise in areas like immigration enforcement makes her a “dangerous and effective pick.”

Bondi previously served as Florida’s attorney general.

“Pam Bondi is exactly what I was saying in the last segment that we should all fear because she’s competent. We may not agree with her ideologically, but she actually knows how to do this job. So if anyone on the Democratic side or anyone who cared about liberty or justice was thinking, well, maybe Matt Gaetz will screw this up and that’ll give us some time,” Johnson said.
...

Johnson pointed out Bondi’s assertive stance on immigration and educational policies to indicate how she might perform as attorney general.

“She knows what she’s doing about immigration. Remember, Florida is one of those states that’s been very aggressive about migrants and deportation and moving people to different states and everything else like that,” Johnson said.

Johnson also brought up Florida’s laws affecting students on campuses and the manipulation of education funds.
...

Democrats appear to have an irrational fear of most Trump appointments including this one.  They also seem to think that US immigration law is optional in hopes that they can import future Democrat voters.  Fearing competence suggests they would prefer incompetence.  I look forward to her being sworn in and taking office.

See also:

Trump Has a New Attorney General Nominee

And:

 Pam Bondi, Trump's candidate for Attorney General:

"These students in universities that say 'I support Hamas, I am Hamas,' they need to be taken out of our country."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more