DOJ withdraws one of the challenges to Texas Voter ID law

Washington Times:
The Justice Department is reversing course in a long-running lawsuit over a Texas voter identification law — a significant shift under President Trump that comes four years after Obama administration lawyers joined civil rights groups in their challenge of the Texas law.

The Justice Department on Monday informed attorneys for a civil rights group challenging the voter ID law that the government plans to file court papers to withdraw the DOJ’s discriminatory purpose claim.

The move to dismiss its claim that the Texas law was adopted with a discriminatory purpose is not an outright withdrawal of the Justice Department from the case — the DOJ’s claim that the law had a discriminatory effect remains intact.

But the distinction is significant, according to Gerry Hebert of the Campaign Legal Center, because if a judge rules that Texas lawmakers acted with discriminatory intent when they adopted the law in 2011, Texas could potentially end up back on the list of states required to obtain pre-clearance from the federal government before changing election laws.

The law being challenged was enacted in 2011 and required Texas residents to show one of seven forms of approved identification in order to cast a ballot. Civil rights groups and the Justice Department filed suit challenging the law in 2013.

The reversal in the DOJ’s stance on the case comes weeks after President Trump’s nominee for attorney general, Jeff Sessions, was sworn in.
...
I think the entire challenge should be thrown out.  The presumption that blacks and Hispanics are less capable of getting a valid ID is preposterous.  The ID can enhance the lives of those who do not have them and allow them to do things like fill a prescription or buy Sudafed at the pharmacy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Is the F-35 obsolete?