Clinton's State Department awards companies that donate to Clinton's foundation

Washington Examiner Editorial:
The State Department's Award for Corporate Excellence is a prestigious honor for U.S. corporations, established in 1999. It "recognizes the important role U.S. businesses play abroad as good corporate citizens."

So what makes a good corporate citizen of the world? It turns out that when Hillary Clinton is secretary of state, this quality strongly correlates with donations to the Clinton Foundation. The Washington Examiner's Sarah Westwood reported Thursday that 22 out of 37 corporate nominees for the award during Clinton's tenure — and six of the eight winners in those four years — just happened to be donors to the Clinton Foundation.

Naturally, if even serious official decisions about foreign ownership of American uranium can fall under the cloud of Clinton cash, then it is hardly surprising that an insignificant award could as well. Clinton's campaign probably has little to worry about these scandals for now. If the Clinton era has taught America anything — from Gennifer Flowers to Marc Rich, and on to President Clinton's post-presidential popularity — it is that Democratic voters can forgive a scoundrel. For example, the latest Quinnipiac poll shows that only 75 percent of Democrats believe Clinton to be "honest and trustworthy" (17 percent say she is not) yet between 85 and 90 percent plan to vote for her, depending on which Republican she faces.

But what Democrats will not forgive is a scoundrel who is also a loser. This is why a new poll should have Team Clinton more concerned than any number of apparently conflicted or corrupt arrangements ever could.
...
That is why the latest Virginia poll showing Jeb Bush beating her is a sign of real trouble for Hillary Clinton.  The combination of the bad polls and the sandal erupting around the Clinton foundation and her times as Secretary of State could be devastating for her.  She was a sloppy Secretary of State who accomplished nothing but contributed mightily to the disaster in Libya,  She showed poor management by ignoring the red flags that led to the Benghazi debacle, and it appears her management of the foundation is equally inept.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more