'Someone else would have been fired if they did what Hillary has done'


Mark Halperin  says destroying the evidence leaves Clinton defenseless in refuting tghe allegations of self dealings.
MARK HALPERIN: Imagine if an Assistant Secretary of State had done what Hillary Clinton-- what we know Hillary did. They would be out of the State Dept.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULIS, THIS WEEK: What things?

HALPERIN: Co-mingling of a family foundation, donations from foreign governments, increased speech fees, and government actions.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULIS: No evidence of government actions.

HALPERIN: We know there were government actions taken, what we don't know --and this goes to the deleted emails-- is what kind of interaction did Hillary Clinton have on her private email account regarding her husband's speeches and Foundation activities involving foreign donations.

If they hadn't been so careless at the Foundation, if she hadn't deleted the emails, if they put somebody out on this show today to answer these questions, I think a lot of this could be put to rest, but none of those things are true.
By destroying the emails it leaves the presumption out there that she had something to hide.   In civil litigation it not uncommon for a court to make a presumption that if a party has deliberate made evidence unavailable the court presumes that evidence would not be helpful to their cause.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare