Obama's liberal fascism

Oleg Atbashian:

...

Per a friend of mine with a Ph.D. in mathematics:

We scientists say that in order to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first build the universe — and that takes about four billion years. But that doesn’t mean we can’t build anything new from existing resources. So telling a businessman “you didn’t build that” is pure sophistry. Such phrases have always been a preamble to looting. Coming from the president, it’s chilling.

Apart from the simple untruth that “government created the Internet,” Obama’s words boil down to the collectivist bromide that the individual is nothing without the society and the state. As one would expect, Obama didn’t come up with it on his own. Standing on the shoulders of his collectivist predecessors, he ineptly restated Mussolini’s motto:

All individuals or groups are relative, only to be conceived in their relation to the State.

Benito’s fellow collectivist Adolf Hitler agrees:

Our nation can achieve permanent health only from within on the basis of the principle: The common interest before self-interest.

If the businessman “didn’t build that,” who did? Apparently, all of us did. And if the credit is equally shared, so must be the reward. Jackpot winners all, no more worries about paying the mortgage or filling the gas tank. This thrilled Obama’s voters during the 2008 election, as his speeches removed moral barriers protecting other people’s property, establishing a new morality of forced redistribution of wealth — previously known as looting.

... 

The context of Obama's remarks keep getting more perverse.  But, I have argued for some time that Obama is more a liberal fascist than a socialist.  That is actually worse than socialism where the state owns the means of production.  Under the fascist system,  the state attempts to control the means of production without ownership, meaning the owner is stuck with the losses while the state attempts to grab all of the upside of the business.  That appears to be Obama's objective with his argument for higher taxes on the job creators.