The deceit of the anti energy left

NY Times:

Sean Lennon: Destroying Precious Land for Gas 

Natural gas has been sold as clean energy, but the word “clean” is taking on a disturbingly Orwellian tone.
It is a pernicious falsehood to claim  that drilling for gas destroys land.  I have seen thousands of oil and gas wells in several states.  It is just ridiculous to claim that gas wells "destroy precious land" or even unprecious land.  There are wells within a few miles of my house.

The foot print of the completed well is relatively small and taxes up less room than a grain silo.  The benefit to the land owner is greater than the inconvenience of having a drilling rig around for a few weeks and the benefit of the gas from the well is greater than a windmill or a solar field both of which consume more land and offer less energy.

As for the clean energy argument, it should be indisputable that natural gas is cleaner than burning coal or oil.  What the anti energy left is angry about is that it is cheaper and more efficient than wind and solar as well as more dependable.  They are disappointed that they cannot push their carbon phobic agenda, but that does not mean they should denigrate a fuel that benefits this country far more their their preferences.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more