Biden's odd asylum policy

 Hot Air:

It may be a wee bit more complicated than that, but perhaps not much more. The Romeike family fled Germany in 2008 after authorities cracked down on the practice of home-schooling, and applied for asylum in the US. Initially, a judge granted their asylum request, but when the Obama administration appealed the decision, that started a long legal odyssey that may have come to an end late last week:

The family moved to the U.S. from Germany in 2008. Their application for asylum said they were fined by the German government roughly $9,000 after homeschooling their children, court documents show.

An immigration judge initially granted the family’s application for asylum. The U.S. Department of Justice appealed the decision, and the U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals revoked the family’s asylum status, documents show.

The family, with the help of the U.S. Home School Defense Association, appealed to the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. A three-judge panel unanimously ruled against the family.

“They have not shown that Germany’s enforcement of its general school-attendance law amounts to persecution against them,” Judge Jeffrey Sutton wrote for the court.

That didn’t happen last week. In fact, that happened ten years ago in 2013, and shortly after the Supreme Court refused to review the decision. And to be fair, the courts probably got this right; asylum for persecution doesn’t usually involve non-discriminatory enforcement of regulation. (Germany enforces the home-schooling prohibitions equally regardless of religious affiliation, and even non-affiliation.)

Since that time, WBIR reports, the Romeikes have continued to live in the US, within a legal limbo of not being here legally but without any good reason to deport them. Since their arrival, the Romeikes have welcomed two more children to the family, which may be a complicating factor for their removal, and at least two of the emigrated children have grown up and married American citizens. That tolerance, it should be noted, seems to have been present in three successive administrations … until now.

So what changed? That’s unclear. What is clear is that someone in the Department of Homeland Security decided to make a change. An immigration official went to the Romeikes’ home and told them to prepare to “self-deport,” apparently hoping that they would go quietly. With minor children still at home and in home-schooling, the Romeikes would much rather stay in the US, especially since the German authorities are not in any better mood regarding home-schooling than they were in 2008.

Clearly, the Romeikes have not been a problem to the US during their stay, but that may not be terribly relevant to enforcing the law. But even with that, it seems very strange to get particular about enforcing the law now after a decade of tolerance to their presence. Perhaps DHS intended to normalize their status after a brief self-deportation (which might be necessary in normal bureaucratic procedures), but that would usually involve letting them know that. It sounds more like DHS wants them to leave on their own to preserve their ability to emigrate legally, but without any arrangements or consideration to allow that on an expedited basis. That could leave them stuck in Germany for a while, which would be economically devastating to the Romeikes.

...

What I find odd about the deportation is that the Romeikes have not been a burden on US taxpayers like many illegal immigrants that the Biden administration has welcomed with open arms.  They have generally been productive and some of their children are now US citizens. 

See, also:

VIDEO: Illegal migrants plant foreign flag on Texas island in Rio Grande as border crisis grows

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more