Some in media can't get over not finding any Russian collusion to explain Trump's victory

NY Times:

Memo Is Salvo in G.O.P. Plan to Move Focus Off Russia


Republicans are pushing the narrative that biased officials set out to sabotage President Trump. At the same time, Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel running the Russia inquiry, is accelerating his work.
So far the only Russian collusion in the 2016 election was done by a team paid by the Clinton campaign and the DNC.  If there is any serious evidence of collusion by the Trump team Mueller has yet to disclose it.  That is likely because there is none.

The memo is about serious abuses by the FBI and DOJ of the FISA courts to spy on a political opponent.  That is not a small thing or a distraction.  It is a serious abuse of power to use one candidate's opposition research so you can spy on the other.  If Trump did something like that the liberals would be up in arms and threaten impeachment.

What I see is a media that is so locked into to something that isn't so, it sees real corruption as a distraction from its own paranoia about Trump and Russia. 

They are like Reagan's joke about the kid whose parents are tired of him pestering them for a horse that they box up some manure and put it under the tree for him.  He gets all excited and starts tearing through house sure that the manure is evidence that the horse is in there somewhere.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more