Kamala Harris's ineffective spending spree

 Twitchy:

Question, if you have to pay someone a million dollars to endorse you, is that endorsement real? Kamala Harris really should be asking herself this very question (and so many more) about the money she spent to somehow buy the election. Honestly, experts will tell you it takes a lot of money to win an election, ESPECIALLY for president, but to raise over a billion dollars, not win the election, and end up $20 million in DEBT?

How the Hell is that even possible.
...

Ok, so now we understand why she's in debt after all of that. $100K to build a set for a podcast not even 100k people watched? If she'd have appeared on Joe Rogan's show it wouldn't have cost her anything and she would have reached millions.

Whoever was advising her should never ever ever EVER work on a political campaign EVER again.

And we thought Hillary Clinton's campaign was bad. Wow.
...

I am not surprised she did not go on Rogan's show because she dodged questions the whole campaign.  She is just not good at responding to questions especially if she has not seen them in advance.  It should not be surprising because she apparently struggled in law school where the Socratic method means you have to be able to respond to questions by the professor.

See also:

Kamala Harris’s losing strategy finally revealed in bombshell report

And:

 What Undid the Democrats? Let Me Count the Ways

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more