Democrats accused of misplaying the male vote in 2024

 Newsmax:

Making the 2024 presidential election a referendum on President-elect Donald Trump was ultimately "political malpractice," according to liberal media pollster Frank Luntz.

"It was too much defining what Trump was, and, Jon, we all know what Trump is," Luntz told ABC's "This Week" host Jonathan Karl. "We experienced him for four years.

"Whoever told her to focus on him committed political malpractice, because in the end you cannot change someone's point of view on him. It was all about her."

The gender gap decided the election, but not in the way Harris' campaign hoped by relying on women to elect the first female president, because Trump was the "voice" for disenfranchised Hillary Clinton voters from 2016 and President Joe Biden male voters in 2020, Luntz added.

"In him they saw someone that represented them," Luntz said. "And with her they saw — and it was great — young women getting excited for the first time, surrounded by women, talking about issues like abortion. That was great for the female vote.

"And men felt ignored. They felt forgotten. And they felt like they didn't even matter."

Ultimately, men "felt betrayed" by the Democrat ticket and repudiated Harris, according to Luntz.
...

I did not consider it a gender campaign.  I remembered that Trump's first term was much better for the country than the Biden administration and I saw Harris as a continuation of the Democrats' failures and potentially worse because of her lack of political talent.  She was never articulate and did not come across as smart. 

See also:

CNN suddenly explodes into Trump Derangement Syndrome meltdown on live TV

...

Rather than acknowledging the fact that Democrats have pushed minority voters into the hands of Donald Trump with their identity politics games, they’re insisting from the rooftops that Donald Trump is a “r*cist” and a “s*xist” and that the voters must be too. That’s not really a way to convince them in the future to vote for you now is it?
...

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more