The Dems definition of 'qualified appoitments

 Twitchy:

The words of the day on the Left and in media (pardon the redundancy as always) are "not qualified," and they're being used in reference to any number of Trump Cabinet nominees and others. One look at where their beloved "qualified" people have led the country and all we can say is count us in to get on board with the "not qualified" people.

One Trump nominee being called unqualified is Pete Hegseth, who the President Elect wants to head up the Department of Defense. The Democrats are calling Hegseth unqualified, so let's see how the people they think are "qualified" have done:
"But progress has been made":
How many people in the private sector could fail that expensively and consistently and still keep their jobs? Lucky for them it's only taxpayer money.
...

Companies would have a difficult time making a public offering of stock if they had a record like this.  If they flunked this many audits they would likely fire their accountants and get someone in who can do the job.

See also:

Stop catering to ‘socially correct garbage’: Why Pete Hegseth is the ‘right pick’

And:

 Dems’ attacks on the intelligent, articulate and patriotic Pete Hegseth show why they lost – a salute to Trump’s defense secretary pick

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more