The Democrats' conflict of interest on education reform

NY Times:

Dueling Forces on Education: Teachers and Wealthy Donors

Mrs. Clinton at a school in Waterloo, Iowa, in November 2007 during her 2008 presidential campaign.
Eric Thayer for The New York Times
Mrs. Clinton at a school in Waterloo, Iowa, in November 2007 during her 2008 presidential campaign.
The pressure Hillary Rodham Clinton faces shows the demands she will have to contend with on a number of divisive domestic issues that flared up during the Obama administration.
The teachers unions oppose any reform that would make them compete for students and dollars and they have invested heavily in Democrats to protect their monopoly position.   They have done a lousy job of educating students, particularly in inner cities where Democrats are strongest.  Since Democrats are dependent on the monopolist for campaign donations they are the least able to push for meaningful reforms.  That is one reason why they push for top down control freak items like Common Core despite its political toxicity.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more