Violation of Iran sanctions nets largest fine in history for oil field service company

Fuel Fix:
A unit of oil field services firm Schlumberger is planning to pay about $232.7 million in U.S. penalties as part of a guilty plea for illegally conducting business with the sanctioned Iran and Sudan, the Justice Department said Wednesday.

The deal marks the end of a six-year federal probe into the company’s activities in those two Middle Eastern countries, which found the subsidiary “took steps to disguise” its overseas dealings for several years.

Schlumberger’s $155.1 million criminal fine is the largest penalty ever billed for violating U.S. sanctions set by the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The firm, which has its main offices in Houston, Paris and the Hague, will also forfeit $77.6 million in profits to U.S. authorities.

“This is a landmark case that puts global corporations on notice that they must respect our trade laws when on American soil,” U.S. attorney Ronald Machen Jr. said in a written statement. Schlumberger wound down its business in Iran in the second quarter of 2013 and exited Sudan before the plea deal.

As part of the plea agreement, unit Schlumberger Oilfield Holdings Ltd. will serve three years of probation and continue cooperating with the government.

The parent Schlumberger won’t be allowed to restart its operations in Iran and Sudan and will be required to report on its compliance with U.S. sanctions during that time. It also agreed to hire an outside consultant to review its sanctions policies and procedures, the Justice Department said. The deal is pending approved by a federal court.
...
The facts alleged suggest an internal compliance problem.  Empowering a compliance officer to reject business in countries under sanctions would have saved the company significant dollars.  It also appears that for this company, a lifting of sanctions in Iran and Sudan will not result in a return to business as usual.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more