Voting against judicial imposition of liberalism

From the NY Times:

Voters Moving to Oust Judges Over Decisions

I don't have the same problem with this that the NY Times has.  When judicial decisions are made to overturn statutes that liberals do not like the liberal judges should live with the consequences of their decisions.  When ther were still Democrats on the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals they always seemed to be finding picky reasons to overturn jury decisions.  Voters got tired of that and people ran against them who said they would put a stop to it and they did.

The Iowas Supreme Court Justices who found a ban on gay marriage unconstitutional have made a political decision and should bear the consequences of that political decision.  If the people of Iowa want to vote to approve gay marriage they can.  It should not be a decision for the court.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more