Over 30 killed when NATO forces return fire on Pakistan militants

NY Times:

NATO forces in Afghanistan launched two air strikes against Taliban insurgents on the Pakistani side of the border, killing more than 30 people, military spokesmen confirmed on Monday.

The air strikes, which took place last Friday and Saturday, were unusual because they involved manned aircraft rather than unmanned drones, which are more commonly used to attack insurgents on the Pakistani side of the border, and which are normally operated by the Central Intelligence Agency.

Spokesmen for the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force initially denied any of its forces had launched the air strikes, although they were confirmed by Afghan police officials.

On Monday, however, an ISAF statement confirmed the attacks, and put the death toll at more than 30. Initially, a base close to the border in Khost Province, known as Combat Outpost Narizah, came under fire from insurgents on Friday. When what the military described as an “air weapons team” responded, they came under fire from the insurgents on the Pakistani side of the frontier, and returned fire, killing at least 30.

When two ISAF helicopters returned to the area the next day, they were fired on again from the Pakistani side of the border, and again returned fire, killing several more insurgents, spokesmen said.

...
The rules of engagement allow our forces to return fire. I suspect those fired upon were supporting the original attacks in Afghanistan. The AP put the death toll at over 50.

There have been several engagements recently where the enemy has lost this many or more, I think it reflects the increased operational tempo brought on by additional troops putting pressure on the enemy and the enemy's attempt to match the surge with additional forces of its on brought in from Pakistan. It will be interesting to see how long the enemy can sustain this kind of casualty numbers before reassessing its strategy of engaging with NATO forces.
Related articles by Zemanta
Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more