Obama's willful blindess to the "change" in Iraq

Linda Chavez:

Barack Obama must be too busy declaring victory to read a newspaper. How else can you explain his obliviousness to what is going on in Iraq at this very moment?

Both The New York Times and the Washington Post this week had front-page stories about successful operations by Iraqi forces to root out Shiite militias in Baghdad's Sadr City - a significant turning point in the war and a huge accomplishment for Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

But there Obama was Tuesday evening patting himself on the back for his Oregon primary victory while once again repeating the same old tired formulation about the "failed" Bush policy in Iraq, "that asks everything of our troops and nothing of Iraqi politicians."

Sadr City has been a major problem for Maliki's fragile government. When Sunni tribal leaders last year began to turn against the insurgency - whose forces were swelled with foreign fighters and which had killed thousands of Sunnis, as well as Shiites and Americans - Maliki came under increasing pressure to rein in Shiite militias.

His first effort to do so in Basra, a Shiite city in the south of Iraq, was largely successful despite early reports of massive desertion by Iraqi troops and logistical problems. But Sadr City has always been the toughest nut to crack, with radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr's militias ruling the streets in the enclave of 2 million people.

Iraqi troops were able to move into Sadr City and restore order there, allowing civil society to function, precisely because Maliki's Shiite-dominated government is making significant strides in political reconciliation with Sunnis.

So why can't Obama acknowledge this improvement? Because he's invested too much in the Iraqis - and America - failing.

...

The Democrat campaign on the war in Iraq has been built on the lies they have told themselves about a failure that does not exist. The real question is why they are yet to pay a political price for being so obviously and disastrously wrong about Iraq. It may take a few months for the truth to seep into the public conscience but when it does Obama is in big trouble.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Apple's huge investment in US including Texas facility