First Haditha case goes to trial today

NCT:

Opening statements are set to begin Thursday in the first court-martial to come to trial stemming from the deaths of 24 Iraqis in the town of Haditha. It is the largest war crimes case involving civilian deaths since the start of the Iraq war.

Marine 1st Lt. Andrew Grayson has pleaded not guilty to charges that, as an intelligence officer, he ordered the destruction of photos of Iraqis slain during Nov. 19, 2005, then later lied about it to investigators.

The 27-year-old Ohio native has also pleaded not guilty to trying to fraudulently leave the Marine Corps.

Grayson's court-martial is expected to last about five days.

...

Grayson is accused of obstruction of justice for allegedly ordering a sergeant to destroy photographs taken of the dead Iraqis.

Grayson has said the policy dictated that photographs of dead Iraqis were to be deleted from computer hard drives if a review determined they were not insurgents.

A charge of lying to investigators arises from his alleged denial when asked if such photos existed.

...
This is basically a "cover up" case that has little to do with the merits of the allegations about events in Haditha. I suspect it will turn on a timing issue. Was he asked about the photos before or after they were destroyed? If it was after they were destroyed, then it would be hard to convict him for lying. If he said they did not exist and then ordered them destroyed, he has a serious problem to explain. However, it is possible that he assumed they were destroyed and they subsequently were destroyed based on normal procedure.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more