Biden's war against free speech
The revelations unveiled by America First Legal mark a seismic moment in the ongoing debate over the weaponization of the Department of Justice under the Biden administration. For years, concerned parents who spoke up at school board meetings found themselves caught in the crosshairs of a federal government wielding its power not to protect free speech, but to stifle dissent. Now, explosive new documents obtained by America First Legal leave no room for doubt: the infamous memo from Attorney General Merrick Garland—which painted parents as potential "domestic terrorists,” for speaking out against COVID mandates, critical race theory, and gender ideology—was not a matter of law or public safety but was motivated by pure, unvarnished politics, and was the result of pressure from the White House.
Today, America First Legal (AFL) released explosive new documents conclusively proving what AFL has known since day one: the infamous October 4 memo from Attorney General Garland labeling concerned parents as “domestic terrorists” was a political operation of weaponized government, not the normal, lawful execution of federal laws by the Department of Justice (DOJ).
These never-before-seen documents—uncovered only because of AFL’s relentless efforts over the past three and a half years—expose not only the Biden White House’s involvement in pushing a weaponized DOJ, but also strong dissent from careers within the Department’s Civil Rights Division, who warned that there was no federal authority or legal basis to target these parents in the first place because their speech is protected by the First Amendment.
According to AFL’s findings, career officials within the DOJ Civil Rights Division repeatedly flagged the gross lack of federal jurisdiction and the First Amendment protections at stake. Their warnings were brushed aside, sacrificed on the altar of political expediency.
The heart of this scandal is encapsulated in a phrase so damning it can’t be ignored: “The WH has been in touch.”
...
The suggestion that parents are "domestic terrorists" is totally bonkers. Parents are allowed to petition the government for redress of grievances. The suggestion that the exercise of free speech on a political issue is domestic terrorism is absurd.
Comments
Post a Comment