Supreme Court lets lower courts know they are not the President
The Supreme Court struck down a lower court injunction blocking the Trump administration’s executive order on birthright citizenship, laying out clear rules for courts utilizing universal injunctions going forward.
The case, Trump v. CASA, concerns universal injunctions that lower court judges have ordered pausing President Donald Trump’s order interpreting the 14th Amendment as not guaranteeing what is known as “birthright citizenship.”
The court ruled, 6-3, that “universal injunctions likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has given to federal courts.”
...
“Traditionally, courts issued injunctions prohibiting executive officials from enforcing a challenged law or policy only against the plaintiffs in the lawsuit,” Barrett wrote. “The injunctions before us today reflect a more recent development: district courts asserting the power to prohibit enforcement of a law or policy against anyone.”
Barrett wrote that “the universal injunction was conspicuously nonexistent for most of our nation’s history.”
...
It looks like some in the lower courts thought it was their job to thwart Trump policies they disagreed with. Barrett and the majority of the court reined in the anti-Trump judges. The issue in this case was whether the children of illegal aliens automatically become citizens of the US. Trump is saying that the offspring of illegals do not have automatic citizenship. This makes sense. Otherwise, the country would be flooded with pregnant women who are not citizens.
See also:
BREAKING: SCOTUS Reins In Rogue Judges In Massive Win For Trump
And:
Left-Wingers Enter New Depths of Rage Over Supreme Court's Nationwide Injunction Ruling
Comments
Post a Comment