Supreme Court backs Trump on deportations

 Trending Politics:

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday sided with the Trump Administration in a 6-3 decision that will have immediate impact on the president’s deportation strategies.

In a ruling that broke down along the panel’s ideological boundaries, the high court granted the Trump Administration’s request to stay a lower court injunction blocking them from deporting individuals to third countries without prior notice. The near-term win will allow for the deportation of criminal illegal aliens to countries like El Salvador, Libya and South Sudan.

The court’s conservative justices ruled 6-3 in favor of the administration, with Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissenting. “Rather than allowing our lower court colleagues to man­age this high-stakes litigation with the care and attention it plainly requires, this Court now intervenes to grant the Government emergency relief from an order it has repeat­edly defied,” Justice Sotomayor said.

At issue was a group of illegal aliens who had challenged their removals to third countries, or those that were not their country of origin. Lawyers for the migrants had urged the Supreme Court to leave a ruling from a ruling in place from U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy, who ordered the administration to halt deportations of all illegal aliens slated for deportation to a country not “explicitly” named in their removal orders, Fox News reported.

The Boston-based federal judge ruled that affected aliens must remain in U.S. custody until they have the opportunity to conduct a “reasonable fear interview,” which allows them to lay out fears of torture or prosecution should they be returned.

When appealing the case before the high court, U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued that Murphy’s ruling had prevented the federal government from removing “some of the worst of the worst illegal aliens.” He further stressed that the individuals in question remained in custody on a U.S. base in Djibouti until given the chance to conduct a reasonable fear interview.

The latest ruling comes as U.S. District Judges have filed a record number of injunctions against Trump Administration immigration actions since the president returned to the White House earlier this year. On Sunday, U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz ordered the release of Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate student who has expressed support for foreign jihadist organizations, from federal immigration custody.
...

Democrat judges want to keep in the illegals.  I think Democrats in general think that they politically benefit from illegal immigration.  The court's decision should restore the rule of law in the US. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more

Apple's huge investment in US including Texas facility

Blaze: Apple announced a $500 billion commitment to infrastructure in the United States over four years, its largest commitment to domestic spending to date. Apple said it will expand teams and facilities in Arizona, California, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Oregon, Texas, and Washington as part of its new spending. With a new facility in Houston, Texas, Apple will reportedly double its investment in advanced manufacturing along with increasing investments in AI and silicon engineering. The company said in a press release that the Houston facility will produce servers to support Apple Intelligence, the "personal intelligence system that helps users write, express themselves, and get things done." ... The Texas facility will be for advanced technologies.   Texas has become a place that is very supportive of the tech industries.  Austin and Houston have seen much of the tech growth in the state.  Texas universities have been active in the AI field.
Read more