Dems sue Trump over reducing government work force

 DC Daily Journal:

...

On Friday, a group of 20 Democratic attorneys general launched a legal challenge against the Trump administration, accusing it of improperly terminating thousands of probationary federal employees without prior notice. The lawsuit, spearheaded by New York Attorney General Letitia James, claims these mass firings violate federal law, which the plaintiffs argue requires a minimum of 60 days’ notice before such large-scale layoffs can take place. For supporters of President Trump, this move might be seen as a necessary step to trim an overgrown bureaucracy, though the attorneys general paint it as reckless and unlawful.

The legal action zeroes in on directives from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), which instructed federal agencies to evaluate the employment of thousands of probationary workers based on what the administration calls “agency judgment regarding mission needs.” To critics, this sounds like an overreach, but to those in Trump’s corner, it’s a pragmatic approach to ensuring taxpayer dollars aren’t wasted on unnecessary positions. The complaint, however, pulls no punches: “These large-scale, indiscriminate firings are not only subjecting the Plaintiff states and communities across the country to chaos. They are also against the law.”
...
The irony isn’t lost on Trump supporters: the IRS, which ballooned under President Biden with plans for 87,000 new hires, now faces cuts that some argue are overdue. The lawsuit laments the human cost, stating, “It has rendered them jobless without providing any advance notice that might have given them the opportunity to seek other employment or even budget to prepare for the loss of income.”

In response, the Trump administration hasn’t been idle. On January 28, an OPM memo offered about 2 million eligible federal workers a “deferred resignation” package, including eight months of pay and benefits—a generous lifeline, some might say, for those willing to step aside. An updated OPM memo from March 4, issued amid legal pushback against DOGE’s streamlining efforts, clarified, “OPM is not directing agencies to take any specific performance-based actions regarding probationary employees. Agencies have ultimate decision-making authority over, and responsibility for, such personnel actions.” This hands-off stance could signal Trump’s trust in agency leaders to make tough calls, aligning with his administration’s push for accountability.
...

Eight months of pay and benefits looks like a generous package for people losing their jobs.  It is actually much better than the 60-day notice requirement that the AGs are talking about.