Democrat judges trying to thwart democracy

 DC Daily Journal:

...

Data reveals a striking trend: over half of all nationwide injunctions slapped on the federal government since 1963 rained down during President Trump’s first term.

These court orders, which slam the brakes on policies or laws with nationwide ripple effects—far beyond just the courtroom players—hit Trump’s administration hard.

Out of 127 total nationwide injunctions since 1963, Trump’s first stint in office racked up 64, according to the April 2024 Harvard Law Review.

Compare that to the 32 combined injunctions dished out to the Bush, Obama, and Biden administrations since 2001—Trump’s team took double the heat of those three put together. The breakdown? Six for Bush, 12 for Obama, and 14 for Biden.

Now back in the White House as of January, Trump’s facing a fresh barrage—over 120 lawsuits from activists, government workers, and others gunning for his executive moves.

Some have already scored nationwide injunctions, with 15 landing in February alone, per acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris.

On Thursday, Trump fired off an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court, pushing to shrink three injunctions blocking his bid to axe birthright citizenship. He wants them limited to just the folks directly tied to those courts.

Harris, in the appeal, called the flood of nationwide injunctions an “epidemic” under Trump’s second term, pointing out that Biden’s first three years saw 14, while Trump’s crew got hit with 15 in a single month.
...

The Democrats lost an election for a good reason and now they are trying to use the courts to thwart the agenda of the winner.  And it is not like there is a lot of popular support for the Democrat agenda.  In fact, their polling suggests the opposite.  Trump hatred is not an agenda and they should not be trying to use the courts to stop the democratic process.

See also:

Why Chief Justice Roberts Is Wrong to Defend Activist Judge

And:

 Federal judges’ Trump hate is only harming the courts themselves

And:

 The Imperial Judiciary Is Trying To Commandeer The U.S. Military From President Trump

And:

 Trump Slams 'Radical Left Lunatic Judge' in Deportation Case

And:

 ‘Why Are They Raising Hell?’: Charlamagne Questions Why Anyone Would Oppose Trump Admin Deporting Gang Members

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more