The weirdness of the Dems

 Twitchy:

You've got to hand it to the Democrats sometimes. When they get their marching orders, they fall in lockstep with each other (or maybe goosesteps?). We joke about noticing when 'the memo has gone out' and, in some cases, they actually do send out a memo, as Twitchy recently reported.

Most of the time, however, they don't need to write the talking points down on a piece of paper (especially now that Joe Biden has dropped out of the presidential race). Some of the party elites simply start spouting a keyword or phrase and everyone else, including the media apparatchiks, falls in line behind them. Just look how much they've all tried to tie Donald Trump to the boogeyman of 'Project 2025,' and how immediately that happened across all politicians and mainstream news networks.

They're like a huge assembly line of Stepford Wives ... or maybe Chatty Cathy pull-string dolls. Tell them what to say and they'll repeat it ad nauseum until it stops working (and then they may still keep repeating it).

Yesterday, Twitchy reported on how this is happening with the word 'weird' and the Democrats attaching it to Trump's running mate, J.D. Vance. Of course, the charge is based on nothing and Vance is more normal than all of the Democrat party put together. Twitter hilariously illustrated that with a deluge of tweets showing freakish Democrats like Sam Brinton, Richard Levine, Drag Queen Story Hour, and much more, all under the heading 'J.D. Vance Is Weird.'

But it is freakish to see the Democrats all bundled together saying the word. That is where Twitchy favorite Tom Elliott comes in. Yesterday morning, Elliott showed some scary statistics about how often the media has used the word weird, but a video is worth a thousand spreadsheets.
...

Check out the link above for several examples of Democrat weirdness. 

See also:

From banning fracking to private health insurance, Kamala Harris is no centrist

And:

Michael Del Colliano

Yes, sir! JD Vance is weird alright.
But then what do we call these folks?
LOL!…
See more

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more