Biden discriminates against straight white males in appointment of judges

 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:

Republican U.S. Rep. Glenn Grothman on Thursday claimed it is "almost impossible" for straight white men to become federal judges as he derided the Biden administration's diversity and inclusion efforts in comments on the House floor.

Grothman in a 26-minute speech railed against President Joe Biden for recent remarks about racism in the United States and claimed affirmative action programs "are designed to be as divisive as possible." He eventually cited an unnamed study that reportedly detailed the administration's federal judicial nominees.

"Apparently, for his first two years, President Biden had appointed 97 federal judges," Grothman said Thursday. "Of the 97 federal judges, I was expecting maybe 25 or 30 were white guys because I know President Biden wasn’t heavy on appointing more white guys. Five of the 97 judges were white guys. Of those, two were gay.”

"So, almost impossible for a white guy who’s not gay, apparently, to get appointed here," he added.
...

Biden has made nominating diverse judges a priority. Of the judges appointed during Biden's first two years in office, 75% were women, 67% were people of color and 47% were women of color, according to an analysis by the 19th News.

Still, the federal bench is predominately white and men. An August 2022 report from the American Bar Association found that 70% of all sitting Article III judges — those appointed by a president — were male, and 78% were white.

Grothman's comments quickly circulated online Thursday evening and drew criticism from Democrats.
...

When I was in law school probably over 90 % of the students were white males.  It was not because of exclusion, but because of interests of the students.  Many of the minority students and women students struggle with the curriculum.  I recall one event in a class where the professor called on a woman student and she said she was unprepared.  A few minutes later she raised her hand to comment on a subject and the professor asked her "why do you want to talk if you are unprepared?"  She responded "I was prepared but I just did not want to talk to you at the time."  Obviously not all women were that way.  I have known some very able women lawyers.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more