Schiff could face expulsion for Russia hoax lies

 Headline USA:

...

(Mark Pellin, Headline USA) Faced with possible expulsion from Congress, U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., claimed that he was defending the “rule of law” by pushing baseless Russiagate claims in his fabulist impeachment persecution of former President Donald Trump.

Schiff responded to a resolution filed Wednesday by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., to expel the Democrat on the heels of bombshell conclusions released by Special Counsel John Durham on the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign for now-debunked Russian collusion. Durham determined that the bureau had no verified information when it wrongly launched its Crossfire Hurricane investigation into Trump.

As former House Intelligence chairman, Schiff shamelessly and repeatedly pushed the Russiagate hoax, both from the House floor and to a compliant mainstream media. In 2017 he notoriously claimed on Meet the Press, “I don’t want to go into specifics, but I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial. But as I’ve said all along, there’s plenty of evidence of collusion.”

Luna, in her expulsion resolution filed Wednesday, called out Schiff for his serial deceptions.

“Schiff lied to the American people. He used his position on House Intel to push a lie that cost American taxpayers millions of dollars,” Luna said. “He is a dishonor to the House of Representatives.”
...

Schiff was an active participant in the Democrats' politics of fraud.  He is not the only one who should face expulsion.  The Russian hoax was an all-hands-on-deck Democrat fraud.

See, also:

How Hollywood Made Russian Collusion Hoax a Million Times Worse

Late-night liars, Showtime's 'Comey Rule' fueled fake narrative for years

And:

 As Adam Schiff leads Democrats trying to downplay Durham report - DailyMail.com reveals how it depicts HIS staffer trying to strong-arm a researcher into probing nonsensical Trump-Russia claims

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more