How CBS cooked the books on Jan. 6 survey

 Becket Adams:

...

But see if you can spot the problem with CBS’s presentation of the data. In case it’s not obvious, the choice of options presented in the network's graphic is rather narrow and extreme — as if YouGov really gave respondents no other choice but to categorize “what happened on Jan. 6” either in the harshest or most approving terms.

Amazingly, something is missing from the CBS graphic and the network’s presentation of the data. To wit, when YouGov asked the question, “What happened at the Capitol on Jan. 6th, 2020?” respondents were given six options from which to choose, not four.

The two options missing from CBS’s graphic are “trying to overturn the election and keep Donald Trump in power” and “a protest that went too far.”

The survey found an overwhelming number of respondents, 76% to be exact, chose “a protest that went too far.” Breaking down the responses by party affiliation, YouGov also found 69% of Democrats characterize Jan. 6 as “a protest that went too far” while a much larger 80% of Republicans say the same.

Why was this omitted from the graphic CBS produced and published on the week of the anniversary of the riot? Were they trying to leave a misleading impression? Probably.

I go along with the majority in the YouGov poll.  Why did CBS leave this option out of their survey?  I suspect they were trying to make Republicans look bad. 

See, also:

JANUARY 6 IN PICTURES: DEM-MEDIA OVERREACH EDITION

The pictures show how absurd the Democras' claims are. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more