Harvard law prof says VP can't break a tie to confirm Court appointment

 Washington Examiner:

A liberal Harvard University law expert stood by his past claims that a vice president cannot break Senate ties on judicial nominations, which, if upheld, could complicate the confirmation of Joe Biden's looming Supreme Court pick.

Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School professor emeritus, has questioned whether the vice president, while acting as the president of the Senate, has the authority to break ties on nominations similar to tiebreaking protocol for legislation. The debate is particularly acute in the current 50-50 Senate, with President Joe Biden set to name a replacement for retiring Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer by the end of February.

Vice President Kamala Harris, in a bit over a year in office, has already made 15 tiebreaking Senate votes. But those are different than breaking a tie on nominations, according to Tribe. He renewed his position Wednesday, saying he doubted he'd reach "a new conclusion" on a 2020 op-ed he wrote in the Boston Globe espousing "the Constitution does not give" then-Vice President Mike Pence "the power to break ties" when approving presidential appointments to the Supreme Court.

...

 I suspect Schumer and Harris will disagree with Tribe and push forward anyway.  Neither of them is considered a judicial scholar, but both of them are politically motivated.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more