Radio host Mark Levin not buying establishment criticism of conservatives

Washington Examiner:

...
Funny. Last week I posted that Fox's attacks on conservatives are going to elect Hillary. Next thing you know, a WSJ editorial page staffer, paid by Murdoch who also owns Fox, accuses me of the same thing. Bret Stephens is a mouthpiece for amnesty, like the rest of the amnesty ideologues at the WSJ. And he's a jester for big government Republicans and corporatists. He's part of the same lame crowd that trashed the Tea Party over the debt. That would be the Tea Party that delivered the GOP both houses of Congress and record state legislative and gubernatorial victories. Conversely, Stephens and his ilk backed Boehner to the end as they back McConnell and Ryan now. Even Ryan is criticizing the Boehner budget process. And the WSJ helped deliver us two terms of Obama with their early and constant propaganda for McCain and Romney.

Meanwhile, the GOP and Stephens celebrate one of the lousiest budgets in modern times and, of course, attack conservative critics as purest hellbent on electing Hillary. Does it get any dumber than these guys? Delusional. Unprincipled. Cronies. I'll have more to say upon my return to the airwaves early next year.

You get the impression that the establishment wing of the Republican party is not very happy with the very people who have given them a majority.  Clearly the conservative wing is not happy with the establishment wing either.  They do not like the deal they strike with Democrats at the expense of conservative principles and they are tired of being asked to support candidates they do not like that much.

It is really a strange argument that is being made by some in the establishment wing.  They are claiming that the candidates who are leading the polls cannot win, but those who are in single digits can?

I have always been a big fan of the Wall Street Journal editorial page, includign some of Bret Stephens's work.  I do not agree with him on this piece.