Thomas Perez would be a terrible choice for Attorney General

Byron York:
...
Instead, there are reports the president is considering nominating Thomas Perez, who served a very controversial tenure as head of the Justice Department's Civil Rights division before becoming Labor Secretary in 2013.

Perez had a reputation for zealotry at the Justice Department. He turned anti-discrimination suits into payoffs for favored civil-rights groups. He meddled in legal cases for the purpose of protecting his treasured and controversial "disparate impact" theory of discrimination from being tested in court. He even investigated whether Amazon Kindle e-readers violated the Americans With Disabilities Act because they were not, in 2010, "fully accessible" to the blind.

There's no doubt Perez alienated Republicans during his time at the Justice Department. In 2009, when he was confirmed 72-22 for the Civil Rights post, 17 Republicans voted for him. In 2013, when he left Justice to head the Labor Department, his confirmation vote was 54-46 — a strict party-line affair, with zero Republicans supporting him.

If Obama were to nominate Perez to be Attorney General, it would be the opposite of the Gates nomination: a divisive choice sure to result in a party-line vote.
...
He would be a tumultuous choice sure to continue the bad relations with Congress that Holder has created.  He has demonstrated a contempt for the law and a manipulative past.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more