Biden has lost on the inflation issue

 Jason De Sena Trennert:

While six months is admittedly a lifetime in politics, as the head of a Wall Street macroeconomic research firm, I can say with great confidence that, as far as the November election is concerned, the issue of inflation is settled, and President Biden has lost. There is not enough time to change the fact that over the last three years, the average person’s purchasing power has declined meaningfully.

How do I know? Tired of wading through measures of inflation from academics and other expensive “experts” that bear little resemblance to the cost of living for the average person, we created our own measure of the consumer price index that includes only what people must buy regularly. Deeming it our Common Man CPI in a nod to the great American composer Aaron Copland, we include only food, energy, housing, clothing, insurance and utility costs. Everything else — from flat-screen televisions to trips to Fort Lauderdale — is excluded.

What we found would not be surprising to anyone who has bought groceries in the last few years or doesn’t have Mom and Dad pay their bills. While wages have risen 15.1% since Mr. Biden took office, the Common Man CPI is up 21.2%. In other words, the standard of living for the average American has deteriorated by roughly 6 percentage points over the same period.

Even with this month’s as-expected inflation numbers, our Common Man CPI has outpaced the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ headline number for nine consecutive months and 34 of the 40 months since Mr. Biden’s inauguration.

Only in the rarefied world of Ph.D.s in economics would someone have the temerity to exclude the cost of food and energy and then call such as measure “core.” Eating and staying warm or cool enough is pretty “core.” Some economists have even gone so far as to create a “supercore” measure of inflation that excludes food, energy and housing costs. How one might delude oneself into thinking that excluding food, energy and shelter from an inflation measure would make it relevant to anyone is beyond me.
...

No one buys another house every week, but they all buy groceries or go out to eat and the cost of that has gone up significantly during the Biden administration.  This cost also has a greater impact on retirees and those on Social Security.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more