GOP blames Dems and Capitol Police for failures on January 6

 National Review:

In the lead-up to the anticipated release of the January 6 committee’s final report on the U.S. Capitol riot, five Republicans who were denied seats on the committee released their own report Wednesday that largely blamed Democrats and Capitol Police leaders for security failures that left the building exposed to violence from former president Donald Trump’s supporters.

Questions about why the U.S. Capitol was unprepared were mostly ignored by the Democrat-led January 6th committee, according to the 141-page report, released by GOP representatives Jim Banks, Jim Jordan, Troy Nehls, Kelly Armstrong, and Rodney Davis. Their report appears to say little about Trump’s role in instigating the riot, a primary focus of the January 6 committee.

The GOP report found that the Capitol Police had obtained “sufficient information from an array of channels to anticipate and prepare for the violence that occurred.” But the Capitol was unprepared for a variety of reasons, “including internal politics and unnecessary bureaucracy.”

According to the report, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Democratic leaders were closely involved in the security decisions leading up to the riot, and Republicans were excluded from key meetings and conversations around House security.

The report looks at the role of then-House sergeant at arms Paul Irving, who was a member of the Capitol Police Board. It concludes that he “succumbed to political pressures” from Pelosi and Democratic leaders “and left Republicans out of important discussions related to security.”
...

 There has been a tendency by many in the media to exaggerate the events of January 6, but this report also suggests that those responsible for defending the building were not up to the task.  They failed to heed the threat posed by some of the rioters.

See. also:

Jan. 6 Committee Fails Again and Proves It's All About the Drama With Latest Move

The committee was composed of a hanging jury that did not allow anyone on it but Trump haters. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more