Biden tries to stop investigation of his Afghan bug-out

 Washington Examiner:

President Joe Biden’s aides are reportedly far more worried about the GOP examining his Afghanistan withdrawal than any sort of investigation into Hunter Biden. It isn’t hard to see why.

Joe Biden’s aides are worried about House Republicans leading committee investigations and wielding subpoena power to look into Biden’s handling of the withdrawal because they can’t dismiss it as a partisan witch hunt — the way they have and will with any examination of Hunter Biden’s business ties. It is not without reason that the president's approval rating tanked during the withdrawal and has never recovered.

Joe Biden repeatedly assured Americans that Afghanistan would not fall to the Taliban, and then it immediately did. He left Afghan translators, who helped American soldiers for years, to their fate with the Taliban. He stranded hundreds of Americans in Afghanistan after giving them conflicting messages that they should evacuate, but also that the Taliban wouldn’t take over. Afghans attempting to flee Taliban control clung to, and fell from, planes that were evacuating Americans.

...

 Would any other president have then, in retaliation for the suicide bombing, conducted a drone strike against an Afghan aid worker with no discernible terrorist ties? Would any other president have sent Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley out to call it a “righteous strike,” even though the Pentagon knew within hours that they killed a civilian?

More specifically, Biden and company massacred 10 civilians, including seven children, in retaliation for a suicide bombing that killed 13 U.S. troops. Was this inevitable, as the Biden administration and Murphy claim?

...

It was one of the biggest foreign policy debacles in history and I have argued that the weakness shown by Biden to the Taliban led the Russians to believe they could get away with invading Ukraine.  It was a historic mistake that we are still feeling the consequences of.  An investigation of the Afghan decision is an imperative.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more