Government accused of destroying evidence of Obama Fast and Furious scandal

 American Actions News:

Republican lawmakers are demanding answers after the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) revealed they were destroying firearms associated with the Obama/Biden administration’s botched Operation Fast and Furious, just weeks before Republicans assume control of Congress and despite ongoing criminal investigations related to the scandal.

During that scandal the Obama/Biden Justice Department allowed Mexican drug cartels to not
only buy 2,000 firearms from legal U.S. dealers using false information, but allowed cartels to
transport and use the weapons to see where they ended up. That differed from Bush
administration policy, in which the illegal buyers were immediately arrested.

An estimated 300 murders are tied to weapons bought during the Fast and Furious scandals,
including the murders of two U.S. Border Patrol agents.

The ATF claims decision was made after the Department of Justice inspector general found
firearms seized during the scandal were improperly stored and should be destroyed as
all “criminal investigations, internal DOJ reviews, and civil suits relating to Operation Fast and Furious have concluded and that stored evidence from that investigation no longer needs to be preserved.”

But Republican lawmakers point out there are still ongoing criminal prosecutions related to the wave of violence the Obama/Biden administration unleashed.

“Although the ATF apparently intends to forget its dangerous misconduct in Operation
Fast and Furious, the scandal is still a matter of public concern,” writes House Judiciary
Committee Ranking Member Jim Jordan (R-OH) in a letter to ATF Director Steven Dettelbach. 
“(E)arlier this year, prosecutors in Mexico charged seven individuals with crimes related to
Operation Fast and Furious, including Mexico’s former top police official and a former Mexican Federal Police commander,” writes Jordan.
...

They need to keep the evidence until all the cases are cleared. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more