The censors masquerading as 'fact-checkers'

 Mark Hemingway:

The 2020 presidential election resulted in something I never thought I’d see — widespread, Soviet-style political censorship in American media. This censorship still dominates our discourse a year later, with no end in sight. There’s a lot to be said about how we got to this place, but it’s worth zeroing in on the two particular mechanisms for how this censorship is being enforced. The first is the rise of politicized media “fact-checkers,” and the second is Facebook. The fact these two entities have now joined forces means speaking freely online without an algorithm slapping a warning label on your opinion or psychoanalyzing your potential for extremism is becoming difficult. 

...

I do find most fact-check offensive.  They take a voice of God tone to their arguments and act like their opinions are the only valid ones.   Many times they are completely wrong, but they censor anyway.  

The Big Tech censorship of Hunter Biden's laptop story led to the disastrous Biden administration which has resulted in cascading crisis because of Biden's ineptitude and corrupt nature.  Polls show that people who were unaware of the laptop corruption story would have changed their vote in enough numbers to change the outcome of the election.  

It is also the case that "fact-checkers" ignored the totally bogus Russian collusion hoax and the stories that were awarded Pulitzer prizes for pushing the hoax.  In fact, there have been serially false stories pushed in the mainstream media since the outbreak of "fact-checkers" that have not gotten that treatment. 

What this exposes is that "fact-checkers" were a snarky way to attempt to rebut things they did not like about Trump and his policies.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains