Progressives are abject failures at controlling crime

 John Sexton:

In today’s NY Times, Bret Stephens argues that the progressive experiment with crime and public disorder has been a disaster for many American cities. For instance, what look like bail reform efforts by a progressive DA in Wisconsin seems to have played a role in the Christmas parade killings by Darrell Brooks.

Brooks already had a lengthy rap sheet and had reportedly run over a woman with the same S.U.V. early this month. But, as The Times reported, he had been “quickly freed from jail on bond after prosecutors requested what they now say was an inappropriately low bail.”

What happened in Waukesha on Sunday is among the consequences of easy bail. And bail reform — that is, reducing or eliminating cash bail for a variety of offenses — has been a cause of the left for years.

You can literally say that progressives saw this coming. John Chisholm, the progressive DA in Wisconsin who has now admitted Brooks’ bail was set too low, previously predicted that at some point his approach to reform would get someone killed:

“Is there going to be an individual I divert, or I put into [a] treatment program, who’s going to go out and kill somebody?” he told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel in 2007. “You bet. Guaranteed. It’s guaranteed to happen. It does not invalidate the overall approach.”

Not only are progressives okay with that in theory, they are okay with it in practice. Indeed, as Jazz pointed out earlier, AOC is taking this moment, as at least a dozen people are still clinging to life, to argue for more bail reform. And then there’s the looting, the shooting and homelessness to consider:

In the meantime, shoplifting has become endemic, brazen and increasingly well organized, culminating in mobs of looters ransacking stores and terrifying customers in the Bay Area last week. Local shops are closing, neighborhoods are decaying, encampments of drug addicts have proliferated, and streets are befouled by human excrement — a set of failures Michael Shellenberger calls in his thoroughly researched and convincing new book, “San Fransicko: Why Progressives Ruin Cities,” “the breakdown of civilization on America’s West Coast.”

As for the rest of the country: Can anyone seriously say that Chicago, Los Angeles, Portland, Seattle, Philadelphia or New York has been improved in recent years under progressive leadership? Why did rates of homelessness register their biggest jumps between 2007 and 2020 in left-leaning states like New York, California and Massachusetts — and their biggest decreases in right-leaning ones like Florida, Texas and Georgia?

Just a year ago, the progressive left was all in on defunding the police, an idea which has quickly proven to be a disaster, contributing to the largest single-year spike in murders in the nation’s modern history (since data tracking began in 1960). The only good news here, as Stephens argues, is that voters seem to increasingly have a good idea who is to blame. He writes, “progressive misgovernance has now tattooed the words “soft on crime” on Democratic necks, and the country has noticed. It will take years to erase.”

...

Democrats have a hard time admitting mistakes and that is why they bitterly cling to failed policies that endanger the law-abiding majority.  Hopefully, those people will start voting against Democrats as they should.  Some liberal cities are looking like they are in the middle of the collapse of civilization.