Since when is oversight and disclosure 'coersive'

Washington Post:
NOAA chief tells lawmaker: No one will ‘coerce the scientists who work for me’

The Obama administration is continuing to resist efforts by a House Republican to gain access to the deliberations of federal scientists who authored a global warming study.
Why is revealing their work product 'coercive'?   The statement makes no sense.  Whether NOAA or liberal globo warmers want to admit it, global warming studies are still hotly contested, pun intended.   One of the reasons it is still so contested is that proponents of theory keep trying to shut down debate and inquiry rather than present the supporting documents for their theory.

Then there is the fact that their models have been consistently wrong in predicting the results of CO2 increases in the atmosphere. There are also allegations that supporters of theory are constantly cooking the books adjusting the data to support their theory rather than adjusting their theory to conform to the facts.

NOAA is acting like it has something to hide which makes the inquiry even more worthwhile.

There is a difference between science and environmentalism and the guys at NOAA do not seem to get it.


Popular posts from this blog

US, Britain and Israel help Iranian nuclear scientist escape

Iran loses another of its allies in Iraq

Texas Congressman Al Green admits to affair with drug using staffer