Since when is oversight and disclosure 'coersive'

Washington Post:
NOAA chief tells lawmaker: No one will ‘coerce the scientists who work for me’

The Obama administration is continuing to resist efforts by a House Republican to gain access to the deliberations of federal scientists who authored a global warming study.
Why is revealing their work product 'coercive'?   The statement makes no sense.  Whether NOAA or liberal globo warmers want to admit it, global warming studies are still hotly contested, pun intended.   One of the reasons it is still so contested is that proponents of theory keep trying to shut down debate and inquiry rather than present the supporting documents for their theory.

Then there is the fact that their models have been consistently wrong in predicting the results of CO2 increases in the atmosphere. There are also allegations that supporters of theory are constantly cooking the books adjusting the data to support their theory rather than adjusting their theory to conform to the facts.

NOAA is acting like it has something to hide which makes the inquiry even more worthwhile.

There is a difference between science and environmentalism and the guys at NOAA do not seem to get it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more