Obamacare is already in a death spiral regardless of court ruling

IBD:
From the tone of his Obama-Care opinion, Chief Justice Roberts seems to believe he's spared a law that's working just fine. Wrong. With or without the court's help, ObamaCare is in desperate shape.

On the very first page of Robert's King v. Burwell opinion is a glaring mistake about ObamaCare. The chief justice explains how states that tried ObamaCare-like market changes — called "guaranteed issue" and "community rating" — saw their insurance markets caught in a death spiral as young and healthy dropped coverage and premiums shot up.

Roberts then claims that in 2006 "Massachusetts discovered a way to make the guaranteed issue and community rating requirements work" by adding an individual mandate and premium subsidies.

Since ObamaCare is modeled on Massachusetts law, ipso facto ObamaCare must also be working. And so the court had an overriding reason to protect it, even if it meant twisting the law into pretzels.

Before Roberts wrote those opening lines, he should have taken a look at what's happening in Massachusetts right now. Had he done so, he'd have seen that even if that state's 2006 legislation worked, ObamaCare clearly hasn't.

Next year, enrollees in Massachusetts face premium hikes that could be as high as 21%. This, mind you, in a state that already had among the highest premiums in the nation and was in no danger of losing ObamaCare subsidies no matter how the court ruled.

The same thing is going on around the country, with insurers proposing rate hikes that in some states top 50%. Oregon regulators are actually demanding insurers raise their ObamaCare premiums by double digits.

And all cite the same reason: ObamaCare's mix of mandates, subsidies and market regulations aren't working. The young and healthy aren't signing up as hoped, the insurance pools are more expensive than expected and so far higher premiums are needed.
...
Roberts got it wrong on the facts and the law and as a result the suffering under Obamacare is extended to at least the nest election.   If there is any good news in this mess it is that it has given teh Republicans a good issue to run against in 2016.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more