Democrat voter fraud defended

The Washington Post has two more writers who want to claim that there is no Democrat voter fraud.

What these guys support is the myth that pursuing fraud cases will disenfranchise Democrats. So why do Democrats oppose voter ID and investigation of fraud? I believe they think it helps them politically.

Like the NY Times these guys are trying to push the myth that there is no voter fraud. Just a hunch on my part, but I'm guessing these guys are Democrats too.

There is nothing wrong for the President and the Attorney General to ask prosecutors to investigate suspected crime. Democrats and Democrat law professors should quit acting like there is.

Gateway Pundit adds much more on the Democrats' myth that there is no voter fraud including this point:

...

Interesting that the authors talk about the close Washington State Gubernatorial Race in 2004 but don't mention the fact that there were more votes counted in King County than voters who live there.

Funny they fly over the St. Louis region where at least 16 democrats were arrested, convicted and sentenced for election crimes (and attempted murder of a federal witness) following the 2004 race alone... But, no Yeti sightings.

...
Hey, it was all a myth. It must be grounds for reversible error in the convictions. To democrats voter fraud is just a synonym for voter intimidations. Don't intimidate their fraudulent voters.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare