4 Dems finally indicted in New Mexico

AP/NY Times:

A former Democratic state senator and three other people were charged with corruption Thursday in a case that a former federal prosecutor has told Congress he believes led to his firing.

A federal grand jury accused the senator and former president pro tem of the New Mexico Senate, Manny Aragon, and the others of conspiring to skim $4.2 million in public funds meant for construction of a county courthouse.

David Iglesias, one of eight United States attorneys removed late last year, told Congress this month that he had rejected what he believed to be pressure from Senator Pete V. Domenici and Representative Heather A. Wilson, Republicans of New Mexico, to rush the indictments, which would have hurt Democrats in the November elections.

Spokesmen for Mr. Domenici and Ms. Wilson, who was in a hotly contested race at the time, said Thursday they would have no comment.

...

Charged with conspiracy, mail fraud and money laundering were Mr. Aragon; a former metro court administrator, Toby Martinez; Raul Parra, a partner in Albuquerque engineering firm P2RS; and a software consultant, Sandra Mata Martinez, Mr. Martinez’s wife.
Why did the NY Times bury this story instead of putting it on page one. It goes against their narrative that there was something wrong with the firing of the US Attorneys. It supports the Bush administrations contentions that the case should have been more aggressively prosecuted. It would have undercut today's lead story that a witness has a different recollection about events leading to the firings. In other words it would have undercut the phony scadal theme they have been pushing.

Clarice Feldman links another report where you have to guess the party of the accused.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more