San Francisco boycott of red states a bust

 PJ Media:

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted Tuesday to end a boycott of 30 red states that had passed laws the radical left thought were anti-LGBTQ or restricted access to abortion. The boycott had prohibited city employees from traveling to or doing business with companies in states that passed conservative legislation, ignoring the most basic purpose of the Constitution: E Pluribus Unum — “Out of Many, One.”

...

“It’s not achieving the goal we want to achieve,” said Supervisor Rafael Mandelman, the sponsor of the legislation to repeal the boycott. “It is making our government less efficient.”

When did the radicals in San Francisco start caring about “efficiency” in government?

Related: Another Premier Business Bails Out of Violent and ‘Hostile’ San Francisco

National Review:

The rollback comes after a report by the city administrator’s office found that no states ever appeared to change their own laws in response to the city’s boycott. A budget and legislative analyst’s report also found the city had done business with the states on the boycott list. A one-year period between mid-2021 and mid-2022 saw waivers for contracts and purchase orders totaling $791 million. Meanwhile, the budget and legislative analyst also found that the city had spent nearly $475,000 in staffing expenses to carry out the boycott.

The effect on red states was non-existent and the city did nearly a billion dollars worth of business with the blacklisted states anyway? Sheesh.

...

San Francisco has not been the attraction it once was because of its homeless and drug problem. 

See, also:

You Won't Believe the Fire Sale Price on This San Francisco High Rise

And:

 San Francisco discovers the consequences of its red-state travel ban

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more