Anti-energy left continues its war against Rio Grand Valley LNG projects and job creation

Fuel Fix:
Opponents of three proposed liquefied natural gas projects in the Rio Grande Valley have hit the projects with three simultaneous federal lawsuits.

Texas RioGrande Legal Aid filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of Shrimpers and Fisherman of the RGV, challenging the issuance of a wetlands permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for Rio Grande LNG and the Rio Bravo Pipeline, two projects being developed by Houston liquefied natural gas company NextDecade.

Save RGV From LNG, the Sierra Club, Vecinos para el Bienestar de la Comunidad Costera and the city of Port Isabel filed two lawsuits challenging the permits issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for the Annova LNG and Texas LNG projects.

“In their approvals of these three highly polluting fracked gas export facilities, federal agencies violated the law by ignoring serious threats to local communities and the environment of the Rio Grande Valley,”Sierra Club Senior Attorney Nathan Matthews said. “It is unacceptable for these agencies to refuse to consider environmental justice and the irreparable harm these projects would cause, and today we continue the fight to hold them accountable and ensure these toxic facilities are never built.”
...
That is a remarkable statement considering how natural gas has actually reduced CO2 emissions in this country and where LNG is used instead of coal.  With a shrinking job market caused by the coronavirus, these suits are doing job seekers in the Valley no favor with their opposition to the projects.  These plants would actually reduce the flaring of natural gas in the oil patch.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more