Where are the WaPo fact checkers when it comes to all of Adam Schiff's lies?

Washington Post:

Schiff ‘has not paid the price, yet’ for impeachment, Trump says in what appears to be veiled threat

President Trump escalated his attacks on Rep. Adam B. Schiff, the lead impeachment manager, one day before the president's team is expected to deliver the crux of its defense.
I am not making any threat against Schiff or anyone else, but it strikes me as weird that the Washington Post fact checks Trump's opinions and off the cuff remarks, but lets a serial liar like Schiff skate. 

This neo-MaCarthyite deserves to be called out for his support of bogus allegations against the President and his campaign. Anyone who still believed in the Russian collusion hoax after the Muller Report and other evidence that was accumulated is undeserving of any credibility.  Schiff also lied about the FISA abuse by the FBI and DOJ. 

Why should anyone believe his ridiculous theories about the President's conversation with Ukraine?  When both the transcript of the call and the statements of the Ukrainian officials make clear that Schiff lied about the conversation.  He assumed facts not in evidence and tried to use them to overthrow the election and cancel the next for the President. 

He should be treated as the treasonous jerk that he is.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more