Jim Jordan destroys the media fawning over Schiff's bogus case for impeachment

PJ Media:
...
Contrary to the Democrats' demands that anyone who doesn't agree with their version of highly-questionable "facts" is a conspirator in a crime, Republicans aren't playing along in light of Schiff's questionable affiliation with the truth. Jordan let loose on Schiff in front of a gaggle of reporters outside the trial.

“We’re supposed to believe Adam Schiff today and everything he’s saying?" Jordan began. "This is the guy who said, ‘We have more than circumstantial evidence that there was coordination between Trump and Russia, and Russia influenced the election.’ That turned out to be false."

Then Jordan launched into several more of Schiff's fabrications.

Adam Schiff said that the Nunes statement was false. Michael Horowitz told us no, it wasn’t; it was exactly right. Adam Schiff said you can trust the FISA court. Michael Horowitz said last month that no, you can’t; they lied to the FISA court 17 times. Adam Schiff told us we look forward to hearing from the whistleblower. Adam Schiff said we’ve had no contact with the whistleblower. Then just yesterday, the story where he misrepresents to all of you … that Mr. Z is Mr. Zelensky, when in fact it was Mr. Zlochevsky. But today we’re supposed to believe him? He just talked for two hours, 15 minutes, and we’re supposed to believe everything he said today, in spite of that history, where seven important things he had exactly wrong!?… That’s the kind of game that they’re playing here, and, again, I think that the American people see through it all.
Jordan left out the part where Schiff fabricated a transcript of the president's call with the Ukranian president and made up outrageous things that no one said during the impeachment hearings in the House. That alone is enough to never believe anything Schiff ever says again.
...
Schiff is wholly lacking in credibility.  His appeal is only to the Trump-haters who are willing to believe anything negative about Trump whether true or not.  Picking him for making their case was a serious mistake by House Democrats. 

Schiff has become the weird face of Democrats against democracy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more