Mainstream media collusion to cover up Democrat scandal?

Washington Free Beacon:
Major cable news networks have given no coverage to the burgeoning scandal involving IT staffers to former DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, according to a Washington Free Beacon analysis.

Reporting by the Daily Caller News Foundation has revealed that Wasserman Schultz's top information technology staffer Iman Awan was arrested Monday after trying to flee the country amidst investigations into Awan concerning banking fraud and a criminal cybersecurity probe. Awan wired over $280,000 to Pakistan after the FBI recently recovered multiple smashed hard drives from Awan's home.

Despite being blocked from the House computer network since February amid allegations of "committing serious, potentially illegal, violations on the House IT network," Awan remained employed by Wasserman Schultz's office. He and four of his relatives have received $4 million by working for Democratic members of Congress since 2009.

Wasserman Schultz finally fired Awan on Tuesday, after he attempted to flee the country. His wife already fled to Pakistan with $12,000 in cash. Awan and his relatives had full access to the emails of the Democratic members they worked for, and Wasserman Schultz's password to her iPad she used while she was head of the DNC.
...
I did finally see a story on the Washington Post website yesterday evening about the arrest of Awan.  As of last night, I have yet to see this story make the front page of the NY Times.  As Mark Steyn points out, this story has all of the elements that the media has been searching for and not finding in the Russia election story and yet they are not covering it.

The Daily Caller has previously reported that Awan has also been accused of threatening kidnapping for cash by his own step-mother.

This is a story that fits the narrative the media has been trying to spin about the trump campaign and they are ignoring it for the most part.  It is an obvious example of media bias.

Awan's attorney has connections to the Clintons and is portraying his new client as a "victim."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Is the F-35 obsolete?