Obama continues iron-willed pander to anti war pukes
Dennis Byrne:
He is also being exposed on his weak lawfare stance on terrorism and his desire to returned to the failed policies of the Clinton administration which led to 9-11. This is ground the GOP is happy to fight him on. Obama's terrorist rights position and his votes for terrorist privacy rights on intercepts of communications show him as a guy who is not as serious about protecting Americans as he is terrorist.
Before Barack Obama can get his presidential hands on the Iraq War, it might end, not in disaster as he figures, but in an American victory.We can expect war critics to continue to try to move the goal posts but it is getting harder to avoid the obvious. Even so Obama continues his ironed will ignorance of the facts and conscience avoidance or reality. He is still stuck in either 2002 or 2006. He ignores what he said in 2004 which was not that different from McCain's current position on troop withdrawals. He was dead wrong throughout 2007 and now that the primaries are over and he is no longer in the Democrat echo chamber he will being to pay a price for being so wrong for so long.
He, his fans and much of the media haven't noticed in the heat of the presidential campaign, but the war is winding down, if not nearing its end. Fewer military and civilians killed or wounded; fewer insurgent attacks; more order and security, especially in such troubled areas as Basra and Sadr City; more reconciliation; improved quality of life, and—not the least—greater liberties.
Still, Obama's perspective remains unchanged. There's no accommodation to changed circumstances, only his iron-willed pandering to anti-war voters. As of this writing, his campaign's Web site proclaims: "Obama would immediately begin to pull out troops engaged in combat operations at a pace of one or two brigades every month, to be completed by the end of next year." Who knows, at the pace of progress in Iraq, maybe the troops could come home even quicker. But for Obama to withdraw troops faster than his stone-set timetable, he would have to acknowledge the progress Iraq has made. And explain how he would continue that progress. He would have to be as responsible as The Washington Post, which in a June 1 editorial noted: "Don't look now, but the U.S.-backed [Iraqi] government and army may be winning the war." The Post, ever critical of the policies of President Bush, could never be confused with drooling neocons.
No one should be uncorking the champagne and breaking out the ticker tape, and it is convenient for me—a war supporter—to quote the Post when it supports my position. So, let's turn to the Brookings Institution's "Iraq Index," which from the start has tried and succeeded to be the war's most objective observer.
It shows that civilian deaths, which a year ago numbered in the thousands a month, are down dramatically, although the hundreds still dying are way too many. Also dropping remarkably is the number of U.S.troops killed and wounded.
The number of Iraqi forces deployed is steadily increasing while the number of attacks against U.S. and other coalition forces is down dramatically. So is the number of Iraqi police and military personnel killed each month. The number of joint security stations and combat outposts, which are security checkpoints in strategic areas throughout Baghdad and manned 24 hours a day by U.S. and Iraqi security forces, has more than doubled. The number of multiple fatality bombings has dropped considerably, testimony to the greater security brought by the surge.
There have been no kidnappings of foreign nationals—once a standard tactic for insurgents—for the last year. Attacks on Iraqi oil and gas personnel and installations (e.g. pipelines) have nearly disappeared. Measures of political and press freedoms have improved appreciably, more children are attending school, more judges are being trained. Quality-of-life indicators have improved. Gross domestic product is more than twice what it was before the war. There has been an explosion of telephone and Internet use, of independent media and car ownership.
...
He is also being exposed on his weak lawfare stance on terrorism and his desire to returned to the failed policies of the Clinton administration which led to 9-11. This is ground the GOP is happy to fight him on. Obama's terrorist rights position and his votes for terrorist privacy rights on intercepts of communications show him as a guy who is not as serious about protecting Americans as he is terrorist.
Comments
Post a Comment