White House has no answer to Chicom energy company payments to Bidens

 Fox News:

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre tried to dodge questions about the Biden family’s connections to a Chinese energy company during her press briefing Wednesday.

Fox News’ Peter Doocy questioned Jean-Pierre on the House Oversight report from Thursday that revealed President Biden’s son Hunter, brother James and daughter-in-law Hallie all received payments from associates connected to a Chinese business.

"House Oversight says they’ve got bank records showing a Chinese energy company paying three Biden family members through a third party. What were they paid for?" Doocy asked.

"Look, I’m just not going to respond to that from here. Look, we have heard from House Republicans for years and years and years how — the inaccuracies and lies when it comes to this issue. And, I don’t even where to begin to even answer that question because, again, it’s been lies and lies and inaccuracy for the past couple of years and I’m just not going to get into it from here," Jean-Pierre answered.

Her response was attacked as "gaslighting" and lies on Twitter.

"Hunter Biden’s legal team has publicly acknowledged that these payments happened. The denial by President Biden and this dodge by Karine are nothing but gaslighting," Washington Examiner Justice Department reporter Jerry Dunleavy wrote.
...

"She’s lying," National Review contributor Pradheep Shanker tweeted.

"The claim is so not true that KJP is unable to flatly deny it," conservative writer Doug Powers joked.

Podcast host Ahmed Al Assliken agreed, "Shes lying and the press knows that she is lying to them."

Washington Times commentary editor Kelly Riddell wrote, "Lies? What lies? Explain to us, by explaining the Biden family transactions, why, in fact, this is a lie."

Radio host and Fox News contributor Guy Benson explained, "She went on to justify her non-answer by citing 'years and years' of ‘lies’ from Republicans — but her boss has told documented lies on this very subject. No response on the bank records is unacceptable. It’s a legitimate question, and if it’s just a new ‘lie,’ prove it."
...

If they can't describe the purpose of the payment that looks like an admission in itself.   I suspect it was part of an influence-peddling scheme by China and the recipients of the money.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare