The Democrats war on energy

 Power the Future:

John Kerry is showing everyone the Biden administration’s true colors again. He told the media that the natural gas industry has to figure out carbon capture technology in the next decade, while also saying they shouldn’t get the infrastructure they need to operate. John Kerry’s misguided claims about the industry represent the administration’s continuing failure to understand they can’t have it both ways. On Thursday, Kerry told Bloomberg TV:

“We have to put the industry on notice: You’ve got six years, eight years, no more than 10 years or so, within which you’ve got to come up with a means by which you’re going to capture [emissions], and if you’re not capturing, then we have to deploy alternative sources of energy.
“No one should make it easy for the gas interests to be building out 30- or 40-year infrastructure, which we’re then stuck with and you know the fight will be ‘well we can’t close these because of the employment, because of the investors, et cetera.’”
As the Presidential climate envoy, Kerry knows that scalable technology is not ready to capture CO2 emissions and sufficient alternatives to natural gas won’t exist within his very limited timeframe. Kerry also ignores the fact that the administration’s opposition to new pipelines is causing the cost of natural gas to rise. The Editorial Board for the Wall Street Journal writes:

“Natural-gas prices have shot up in recent months because production isn’t keeping pace with demand as the economy continues to recover and coal plants shut down. Political opposition to new pipelines is constraining U.S. production. Without more pipelines, U.S. energy prices will increase.”
Biden, Kerry, and the unelected bureaucrats that work for them are doing everything they can to kill American natural gas. In February, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) tried to jam through a rule that would have made new infrastructure projects impossible. Sen. Manchin and PTF are standing up to FERC. Join us by signing your name to our petition.
...

The Democrats are all about killing the existing energy business with the vain hope that it will lead people to accept crappy green energy programs that are totally inadequate to sustain the US economy, much less grow it.  Europe has wised up to some degree now calling natural gas a green source.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more