Musk opt out of Twitter board seat?

 Washington Examiner:

...

Musk has been openly critical of Twitter’s controversial handling of speech on its platform, and the initial massive stock purchase was praised by many free-speech activists who see Twitter as engaging in forms of censorship.

Mark Weinstein, founder of social media service MeWe and expert in privacy and free speech, told the Washington Examiner that Musk getting offered the board seat and then turning it down allows Musk to be much more critical about Twitter without concern about being a “nice guy” with the board members.

“I think he assessed his strategy and his strategic approach to helping Twitter change, and it’s almost like mandating change at Twitter — his ability to mandate versus his ability to suggest,” Weinstein said.

Joining the board would have limited Musk's ability to purchase more stock.

Aron Solomon, the chief legal analyst for Esquire Digital, said that Musk’s decision to abstain from the board “makes so much more sense” given the fact that he would have to limit his control of the company to just 14.9%, according to the agreement. Solomon, who noted that he isn’t the biggest Musk fan, did say Musk’s decision was a “brilliant strategic move.”

If Musk’s endgame is to own enough stock, more than 50%, to have a controlling interest in the company, then joining the board would be a terrible idea.

...

It looks like a smart move if his goal is to increase free speech and get greater control over the censorship geeks at Twitter. Their censorship of the NY Post story on the Biden corruption was one of the most disastrous moves in history.  I think it was indefensible.

See, also:

Elon Musk's Twitter Strategy May be About Countering the ESG Political Movement Infecting Corporations Says Expert

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more