Taking on the anti energy left and the anti frackers
Bloomberg/Fuel Fix:
I don't have a high regard for the anti energy left. Their agenda will make the US a poorer place to live and will harm the middle class and the poor the most. It is an unhealthy agenda masquerading as environmentalism. In the end their agenda is bad for the economy, jobs and the environment. The alternatives they are pushing are expensive, harm the environment, and are inefficient. They try to drive up the cost of traditional energy with frivolous objections and law suits and bogus political movements. Defeating them would be a service for all mankind.
As he took the floor at the tony Broadmoor resort in Colorado Springs, the veteran Washington public relations guru had an uncompromising message for oil and gas drillers facing an anti-fracking backlash.There is more.
“You can either win ugly or lose pretty. You figure out where you want to be,” Rick Berman told the Western Energy Alliance, according to a recording. “Hardball is something that I’m a big fan of, applied appropriately.”
Berman has gained prominence, including a “60 Minutes” profile, for playing hardball with animal activists, labor unions and even Mothers Against Drunk Driving. In Colorado, he was offering to take on environmentalists pushing restrictions on hydraulic fracturing, or fracking.
The fight over fracking in the state has been viewed as a bellwether for similar debates brewing from New York to Sacramento. Energy companies are lobbying against a slew of regulations, including ones setting safety rules for fracking on public lands and another capping carbon emissions from power plants.
That partly explains why energy and resources companies, including Koch Industries Inc., Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) and Murray Energy Corp. are spending lavishly on political campaigns this year. The Center for Responsive Politics data shows the industry will contribute an amount second only to its record $143 million leading up to the 2012 election. So far they have given $95.5 million to candidates and political committees.
Industry supporters say they have no choice. They face a well-funded environmental campaign from groups such as the Sierra Club that threaten to endanger the boom in production and domestic manufacturing that followed the shale revolution.
“There is an anti-fossil fuel movement, and a very well-funded lobbying campaign is behind it,” said Michael Krancer, Pennsylvania’s former top natural-gas regulator and an energy attorney at Blank Rome LLP in Philadelphia. “These are people who want to live in a dream world.”
At the June session in Colorado with executives from Halliburton Co. (HAL), Exxon and Devon Energy Corp. (DVN), Berman offered companies a way to anonymously target their environmental foes – - at a cost of as much as $3 million. The recording, provided to Bloomberg by an environmental advocate who got it from an attendee, shows an unvarnished look at what Berman promises companies in pitching for their business.
He said his campaign would follow the playbook from his earlier efforts: attacks on the hypocrisy of adversaries, an undercurrent of absurdist humor and the promise of anonymity for the companies behind it. The recording makes it clear that Berman is pitching for their business, and says some companies have already funded the campaign with “six-figure” payments.
...
I don't have a high regard for the anti energy left. Their agenda will make the US a poorer place to live and will harm the middle class and the poor the most. It is an unhealthy agenda masquerading as environmentalism. In the end their agenda is bad for the economy, jobs and the environment. The alternatives they are pushing are expensive, harm the environment, and are inefficient. They try to drive up the cost of traditional energy with frivolous objections and law suits and bogus political movements. Defeating them would be a service for all mankind.
Comments
Post a Comment